🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Mar 2018
OK, I'm not a complete moron (a half moron, yes) so I gather most folks don't like that the scales tip more toward comedy this time around, and that, after the absolute classic the first is, that chances are a sequel was just gonna pale in comparison.

But hear me out (read me out)

I've made it very clear (annoyingly so, I'm sure) that I'm a ROTLD fanatic. I think about that movie or some facet of that movie at least once a week. However, ROTLD 2 means nearly as much to me, but perhaps more for nostalgic reasons than anything. It was the first horror movie I ever saw in the theater. It scared the everliving piss outta me. I didn't see the original until a few years after that, but the way I see it, part 2 has always been a great companion piece to the first. Ok, I realize I could come off as being bias.

I watched it a few nights ago so that's why I'm writing this. I still love the movie. It has a lot to like in it and when I see people bashing it it does leave me scratching my head.

For starters, I think the movie is actually a bit creepier than its rep suggests. Yeah, there are some pretty hokey comedy bits thrown in, but when the film does want to scare you, I think it does an admirable job. Tarman 2.0 surprisingly outdoes the original Tarman, lookin' like an animated glob of molasses from hell. Another part that kinda sends a chill down your spine (if you allow it to) is when a zombie tries to trick our cast of characters into "coming to the hospital" but is outed upon answering Harry Truman after being asked who is the current US president.

Special fx, blood, zombie make-up and pus are better than ever, and perhaps in some ways even ickier and more elaborate than the original. But of course, that doesn't necessarily make the movie. It's just icing on the cake. Musical score? If we're talking the original score and not....whatever the shit we hear on the WB DVD is...is memorable, distinct, lively and with loads of personality. This is no dull score. Music can make or break a movie, in my opinion.

The pacing is nuts. Seriously, it's some of the zaniest, wildest, most delerious pacing in any movie ever. Broad claim, but I think it's true. This bad boy starts with a bang almost immediately and never lets up. The scene where our cast of heroes all first meet up at Jesse's house, deal with the decapitated zombie head ("get that damn screwdriver, OUT of mah head!"), go to Doc Mandel's house (best character in the movie) to get his car and play hot potato with a zombie's severed hand is exactly what I'm talking about: it's so over the top and fun, it tickles my movie-loving pickle in all the right places.

I'm not expecting to change anyone's opinion, just voicing my own and some of the reasons why I think this sequel is rather underrated. It isn't bad. It just isn't the original. The re-casting of Thom Matthews and James Karen in different roles was always a neat touch, despite the fact that Mr. Karen was given better lines (and probably better direction) as Burt in the original. Linnea Quigley (and her, um, quiggleys) are sorely missing, but we have one of my favorite ultimate 80s chicks Suzanne Snyder instead playing the bitchy hair metal girlfriend lookin' like she'd rather be on the set of the new Whitesnake video. The music is pretty good too, with some Robert Palmer tunes, a great opening song by Julian Cope that really sets the tone, and a cool party remix of Monster Mash to close out the film. Anthrax even sneaks in, though you'd have to have a good ear to catch their ode to Cliff Burton being snuck in.

All in all, love, love, love it.



🚸
avatar
sfpx says:
#10, Reply to #7

Mar 2018
I'm on the fence about part 3. In some ways, it's a good film insofar that it tried something different and, in the uncut version at least, it's pretty gory. But in other ways, it just reeks of 90s straight-to-videoness - that chasm of time from about 1993 to 1999 where horror sucked mostly, and it just looked cheap and bad and 90s. There's 80s cheap, which is good, but 90s cheap...ugh. I just don't like it. It's kinda hard to describe, but it just feels off. When there's poor CGI being used for fire, instead of, you know, like actual fire, things have really hit rock bottom.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#13, Reply to #10

Mar 2018
There's 80s cheap, which is good, but 90s cheap...ugh. I just don't like it. It's kinda hard to describe


It is hard to describe but easy to spot. My first 90's disappointment was when I watched Basket Case 2 after loving the original. Even being from the very early 90's, completely devoid of 80's charm. Film quality had a lot to do with it, I guess.


🚸
avatar
#28, Reply to #7

Feb 2023
Bump


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#18

Mar 2018
Nostalgia's a big reason for me too when it comes to still getting any enjoyment out of RotLD 2. I didn't see it in theaters because I would've been about 7 months old, but I did rent it plenty after catching the original on TV in the late '90s. At a time where I didn't know much about zombie movies or where to find them, I was grateful to have access to it.

One actor you didn't mention who I think deserves a mention is pre-Twin Peaks Dana Ashbrook as cable guy Tom. While his character's pretty generic, he seemed to do his best with what he had to work with. Also, too bad Billy the bully was Thor Van Lingen's only role. "You told, you told, now you die like me."

Hopefully the original score is reinstated one day. The Dead Return (heard during the cemetery resurrection scene) is up there with The Trioxin Theme in the original. For a while, I thought Scream Factory or a similar company would get around to giving the movie a good release with the correct music, but apparently WB refuses to play ball when it comes to anyone else handling their releases.


🚸
avatar
#19

Mar 2018
i feel pretty much the exact opposite about this movie emoticon


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#24

Mar 2018
Back in the days when I was actively trying to catch up on all these popular horror movies, I had seen RotLD1 and was very disappointed after just watching Romero's Dead trilogy. Those movies set the bar so goddamn high, it took a while for it to sink in that zombies can have all sorts of different types. I still think Romero zombies are the best, but RotLD was more of an acquired taste to me. Over the years, I've grown to love it, but even before I could say it with certainty, I was still plenty interested in seeing what part 2 would be like. Doesn't that cover art intrigue you?

RotLD Part II is great. It's far more cheesy, and childish, but I liked it. I liked the electricity twist, I liked the return of Thom Mathews and James Karen as bumbling idiots, I liked Dana Ashbrook and his spandex-wearing girlfriend, Tarman, the cemetery fog scenes, and the suburban setting. Even if it's stupider than the first one, it's still pretty fun, and arguably my favorite in the series. (Haven't seen 4 or 5 yet).

When I met Thom Mathews at a convention, I asked him why he was basically playing the same character, and he said it was because some foreign company that was producing demanded that these two idiots comes back. Thom didn't seem fond of part 2, but I like it enough.


🚸
avatar
#26

Mar 2018
I saw it in the cinemas as a kid, own it on DVD but must confess I really haven't watched it in years. I like part 3 much more but part 2 is infinitely better than the 4th or 5th installments IMO.


🚸
avatar
zed says:
#27

Mar 2018
I've gotta agree part 2 is also a great film, yes its very lame, but it glorifies in it and thus one can only help but love it



@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.