🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Jan 10
The trailer for the movie looked terribly underwhelming. They wanted to market this as a straight-up horror film, but if you think about it, the original Exorcist was more of a psychological drama for most of the movie. This movie goes for that approach too, meaning that its trailer isn't showing you the movie you end up getting.

What you get is actually a pretty simple story. Two young girls go missing, and their respective families experience some bizarre shenanigans. It takes the legacy sequel approach by bringing back a familiar face or two, but the main idea is pretty concise. I wouldn't say it's very scary, but it is well made. That's what I say about the original, too. It has a few decent creepy moments, and I think it was trying to channel Hereditary a bit, especially by casting Hereditary actress Ann Dowd in yet another spiritual horror character role. I also liked the ending. It's a bit of a twist, both bittersweet and still quite bleak.

For anyone wondering about continuity, nothing in the movie negates the events of Exorcist 2 and 3, and the director confirms that. So none of that garbage where it's a sequel only to the first film, though the first film of course will be the only film they reference, because even I don't remember part 2, and modern audiences shouldn't have to relieve that mess either.

Not a bad flick like I was expecting, but poor box office and reviews tell us we probably wont be getting this turned into a trilogy like they planned. I wasn't terribly attached to that idea anyway. As a stand alone legacy sequel, it works just fine.


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#3, Reply to #2

Jan 12
Well, I love him. I enjoyed Righteous Gemstones, I actually just watched Pineapple Express again, and I loved his Halloween trilogy. It's got to be tough to have a trilogy planned, yet need to keep the first entry contained enough in case it doesn't take off. How I see it is that he wanted to homage the original film as much as he could, but for the sequels, you have to subvert expectations and give us something we haven't seen before. And at this point, what haven't we seen? It had to be different, and at this point, it will always be divisive. I see enough references and attention to detail to know that he's a fan of these movies, and it's every horror director's wet dream to get to tackle a classic franchise.

FYI, I purchased the new Exorcist on blu-ray. I like what he did with it.


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#7, Reply to #4

Jan 13
This movie has balls. Bringing back a legacy character just to stab her eyes out?! And I really love that ending where they send a little innocent girl to hell. These days, it's (still) all about subverting expectations, like with how they handled the head spin this time around, or how it's a twofer possession. I think they covered all the bases pretty well.

I think you may be developing a hate boner for David Gordon Green.



Loading...


Loading...

@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.