🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
đŸ—¨ī¸Forum

đŸŽžī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Mar '17
I watched this for the first time last night. I went into it having no idea what it was about. I mainly watched it for Bill Paxton. Anyway, I have some problems with the ending.

I thought the movie was great when it was about a demented lunatic having his sons help him kill innocent people in the name of God. But by having the twist be that everything the father said was true, I feel that the movie kind of comes off as being pro religious fanaticism. As a rational atheist, I find that to be little irresponsible. I mean what are we supposed to take away from this? That you shouldn't question any hallucinations that you receive from "God"?

Do I have a point here, or am I overthinking what is just supposed to be a creepy fictional story?

👍1 đŸ’Ŧ9 🚸 👀1.7k

🚸
avatar
jimb14red says:
#1

Mar '17 *
I think anytime anyone says a movie is pro anything as some sort of negative thing they are overthinking it. Even if the director means for it to be pro anything it is still a work of fiction and the viewer gets out of it what they want. I get entertainment out of Fraility even if Bill Paxton told me this was a pro releigious fanaticism film. I am also an atheist but love the film and the ending. I also find the Exorcist to be a great film despite being an atheist.



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.