๐Ÿ””Alerts
Login to get notifications!
๐Ÿ—จ๏ธForum

๐ŸŽž๏ธMovies & TV


๐ŸŒJunk

๐Ÿ”
Search keywords
Joinโž• Now!   or       ๐Ÿ”ฝ Forgot Password?

Nov '17
It's pretty clear the series hit a stride with Parts 3 and 4, then 6 and 7. These feel like the films that set up and use the Jason archetype that the series is best known for.

So why is part 5 generally considered an odd one out in that run?

Is it merely the Jason copycat angle?

Personally I find it up to par with the other Friday sequels in that era, I may even prefer it to Part 4 and 7.

Ethel's son on the motorbike, what was going on in that scene? Freakin' hilarious.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#8

Nov '17
It is a damn weird sequel, isn't it? It's as if they needed a new entry in the series, but since Jason was dead, they didn't want to go the supernatural route. Not yet! So they had a copycat, but they never really gave him a good motive. I guess it was a similar angle to the Pamela-Jason angle, with Roy and fat victim kid.

I just think the motive to kill is so stupid, you gotta love it. It's quite entertaining, and a little more vivid than the previous entries. Great kills, great tits, fun characters... I love the whole barn finale. I just like barns, and Part 3 and 5 have great barn endings.

Also, I love how the cover art features a mask that's never in any of the movies. Still a cool cover either way.



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.