🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Apr '20 *
image

So, am I to understand that Terminator: Genisys is no longer a thing? No longer a consideration within the Terminator universe, I mean. The thought of another sequel coming along and erasing Genisys always sounded reasonable to me, but in this case, maybe not...? If not merely a fitting finale, Dark Fate was always an opportunity to get the T-train back on the tracks, which, even originally, seemed very unlikely for many reasons. However, after watching Terminator: Dark Fate, I'm afraid we've now strayed further than ever. Well, sort of. As usual, it's complicated

image Yep, Genisys never happened. Neither did Salvation. And the machines have yet to rise. However, Judgement Day is still around. They're letting us keep that one, along with the original, of course. But back to T2. The events from that movie happened as we remember them, but it's what happened shortly thereafter which changed everything we are familiar with. After Skynet's existence was literally wiped out in T2, it somehow continued sending back Terminators to take out John. And you know what? One finally got him. In a scene filled with CGI goodness, we witness something that looks almost like a cut scene from T2. We see what appears to be young Linda Hamilton watching in Horror as young Edward Furlong is blown away by a T-800, who looks kind of like Arnold, but, of course, is not. So, Skynet is gone, John Connor is gone, and... Alright, then. Great start!

image Fast forward to present day Mexico, and we got a familiar series of events with two naked Terminators showing up from the future. One good, one bad. The bad one is something called a Rev-9. Those things are like T-1000's if they were made of tar instead of that cool, silvery liquid stuff. This thing is proven to be a bad sonofabitch pretty early on. Far more advanced and dangerous than the T-1000, actually. As it would turn out, the good one isn't really a Terminator at all. Grace is some type of cyborg-human hybrid. The third time they've attempted this in the series, and coincidentally, the third time they've also attempted a female Terminator. That is, if you count the TV show. Who do they want to kill/protect? Who the hell is left? Well, some chick, apparently. The Rev-9 nearly ends some chick and her brother, but Grace comes in at the last second and takes down the Rev-9 because she's a girl and girls can do that... If they choose to, I mean. They don't have to!

image Taken down but not out, the Rev-9 recovers in record time. Some chick's brother gets taken out pretty quick, but he's a guy, so, no loss there. Grace and some chick come pretty close, themselves, but are saved by none other than Sarah Connor, who is, once again, being portrayed by Linda Hamilton. A very prepared Sarah just about blows that Rev-9 thing to hell, but only weakens it enough for everyone to get away. After getting ditched, Sarah catches back up with the girls and soon learns a few things: First and foremost, Skynet is indeed gone. Sarah and her son really were successful, which is really confusing, because what's with non-existent Skynet sending back more T-800's from a non-existent future? I'd really like someone to explain that to me how that works. Anyway, Grace has no idea what the grumpy old lady is going on about. Sarah learns that some other AI system will eventually be developed, which gives way to a similar Judgement Day, eventually giving way to a similar resistance. However, it's totally different because it's not called "Skynet". It's called "Legion". And as it would turn out, Legion is not after some "new John Connor" that some chick will give birth to ... Wait for it... Some chick is the actual target! So, shame on all you sexists who assumed that the only thing special about some chick was her uterus.

image So, why is Linda Hamilton in this, again? Her character is more or less an obsolete relic from an obsolete reality that can't decide if it exists or not. Just hanging around, making snarky remarks. At least that hasn't changed since Genisys. Sarah makes mention that Terminators, yes, Skynet's Terminators, never stopped being sent into the past. Sarah reveals getting a "heads up" via text from an unknown source every time this happened, giving her the upper hand and making it possible to take out every one. Same story with the Rev-9, which is highly unusual. This unknown source, who Grace has also been instructed to seek assistance from, turns out to be none other than that same T-800 that killed John over 20 years ago. His name is Carl, and he's got a wife and step-son, and somewhat of a personality. And you know what else? He gets it. He gets what he did to John was a dick move. Carl gets that this hurt Sarah, and he's genuinely sorry. Carl wants to make things right, as he's been trying for years. Sarah says "fuck off, Carl". However, he's too valuable of an ally at this point, so, Carl sticks around to help Grace and some chick figure things out while Sarah pouts over her dead son. And after being portrayed as naive and unprepared for her fate the entire movie, some chick then suddenly snaps out of it. Some chick is now the warrior she was always destined to become, taking charge, getting everyone in the zone for one final battle with the Rev-9. Because sometimes chicks can do that.

image What is it going to take for someone to finally take this franchise fucking forward? This isn't normal! Salvation sucked, but at least it kept the story going, as opposed to running around in circles like Genisys and Dark Fate. Just remake the original already and get it overwith, you assholes! Why put this once great franchise through all this? You can't add all this remakey shit and still keep the old stuff around. It makes no sense, even for a time travel movie. And I thought Genisys was pretty bad, but looking back... Yeah, ok. Pretty bad! Yet, as far as Terminator sequels go, I can deal with Genisys a little better. Genisys is almost like hanging out with an old friend you haven't seen in forever. You realize you missed old friend more than you thought, which gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling, even though they've clearly changed some. Dark Fate is like a new friend you don't know very well, but they have qualities which you find appealing and familiar. You don't fully trust new friend, but still have a blast hanging out with them. Those two films CAN be seen as similar in a way. Both have a bit of a "what if" thing going on, much like a fan film. Genisys implies alternate timelines, where as Dark Fate almost seems like that's what they were going for, but I don't think they were. It's hard to tell exactly what they were trying to do here. Personally, I find it all more enjoyable to pretend this is just another timeline.

image Before I lay into this movie some more, I do want to point out that I really did enjoy it. Terminator: Dark Fate is a crazy, fast-paced action flick that turns out to be a lot of fun, though a lot to take in, at times. They came up with some pretty cool stuff for the Rev-9, building it up as a far bigger threat than any Terminator before it, even though it was technically not a Terminator, because that's a Skynet thing. And Grace wasn't such a bad character. Not annoying at all, actually. I think they got the human-Terminator hybrid down nicely this time. And ultimately, this IS a Terminator movie, so, I can't not love it. However, it all turns out to be a hollow, meaningless experience, mostly due to lazy writing and atrocious continuity.

An entry which not only strays further from the tracks, but goes the extra mile, destroying said tracks and building entirely new ones in the exact same spot for no real reason. All the while pretending to be a fresh take on the whole thing. It's only fresh or different on the surface. Legion IS Skynet and some chick IS John Connor. However, they don't go by those names, so, it's hard to get as invested in this as one could be. They really dropped the ball, excluding John Connor simply because he didn't fit into the "girl power" narrative they were obviously going for. It does seem like appealing to the woke crowd and turning this into a "feminist circle jerk" was a far bigger priority than making it the respectable follow up it was promised to be. And this could easily be the final installment, making it all the more unfortunate. But I suppose it's far more important to prove to the world, once again, that girls can do anything boys can do. Even be John Connor! 5/10

image


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#1

Apr '20
A bit of clarification: Skynet didn't continue sending terminators back after being destroyed. Think of it as a retcon/cut-scene from T2 if you will. Back in T2's prologue, it is said that Skynet sent back a T-1000 and so the resistance sent back uncle Bob the T-800. This movie suggests that more shit happened. Skynet not only sent the T-1000 back, but as Sarah said "multiple machines", which includes at least one more hostile T-800 who got John on the beach.

They never specified how many, which means that there could be more model 101's wandering around to leave it open for Arnold to be yet another appropriately aged T-800 in a later entry, should they have the balls to do that, which is unlikely considering that girls don't have balls.
I'm on the same boat as you. I love it because it's a Terminator movie, but it's just another goddamn rehash which tells the same story yet again. There's so much potential for new direction, and while Salvation did indeed suck, it at least tried something different.


Some call this "Woke Fate" because it's racially diverse and gender-centric. Our man Arnold does a great job as always, but he's still reduced to comic relief so our other characters can be better than him. Perhaps my biggest beef is this supposed return to form wasn't nearly as dark and brutal as I wanted an R-rated Terminator movie to be. Nobody gets punched through the gut, and no machines perform surgery on themselves. People don't get stabbed through the mouth or the eyeball. There's barely any blood in this whole movie, for fuck's sake. Just because you kill off a kid in the beginning doesn't mean you're hardcore. It only means that Edward Furlong is too fat.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#3, Reply to #1

Apr '20
I can go with that being IT, but I figure my lack of understanding is due to the movie not being entirely clear about things. The way Sarah words it does sound like Skynet was sending them in real time, and Skynet is sort of talked about later on like it's still a thing, so, there's no way I'm alone in my confusion. I rewatched Genisys again last night, and feel like they did a slightly better job at explaining their horseshit, which was ultimately a more complicated concept.


Your explanation is probably the only explanation that it could be, but the entire theory is easily dismantled, as is anything involving time travel. Hard to have rules for something that (probably) doesn't exist. But the way I see it, ending any chance of Skynet existing in T2 means every trace of it SHOULD be gone, and to be extra anal about it, every memory as well. John shouldn't have been born and Sarah shouldn't even know who Kyle Reese is. I can forgive that, cuz if they were serious sticklers about it, it wouldn't do the movies any favors. But regardless of when Skynet sent the other Terminators, it shouldn't have been able to send anyone cuz Skynet never happened. Sarah, John and Bob didn't go drive to someone's house and burn it down. They made things never happen to begin with which would obviouslty prevent other things from happening, and so on. Uncle Bob shouldnt have had to off himself and the T-1000 shouldn't have been a problem in the third act. That was my immediate reaction when I saw it for the first time when I was 12.

That's the one thing about Dark Shadows that gets under my skin. Quentin's ghost is a problem, so, Barnabas goes back in time, prevents Quentin from dying EVER, goes back and people make mention of his ghost as if they merely defeated it and made it leave, meanwhile, human Quentin is hanging around with no knowledge of any of this other than what he's been told. They're literally discussing an erased reality that they should no longer know about.

I don't see how they can keep going from here. I said the same thing after Genisys failed, but that was a half decade ago, and an old man can age a lot in that time, and they probably felt like the return to the "R-rating" was their last hope to keep this going. At this point, those Hollywood cunts are probably thinking people just don't like Terminator movies anymore. If they were to decide at some point to do another one, Arnold might be close to 80 in it. If it's like 2024 and they're still trying to fit Arnold into it, I'm out. However, if they choose to go on without him, the possibilities are endless. I'm a firm believer that T3 should have been Arnold's T-Swansong and only 3 more movies should have been made, all of which tackle the actual war.


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#4, Reply to #3

Apr '20
Just think about it... Arnold will be 82 in 2029! He was about 37 when he made the first movie. He's been playing a robot for the last four decades. As an Arnold fan, I know it'll be retarded if he comes back, but I'll still watch it.

There's only one way I can view the time-travel stuff in which paradoxes don't make my brain explode. When someone is sent back, regardless of whether they prevent their native future or not, they'll be permanently set into whatever time they arrive in. I hate all that grandfather paradox shit because it's overdone and it takes all the hope out of it.

Of course, the text messages / ripples thing doesn't make much sense and we're just supposed to overlook that, apparently. Even if a shockwave went through the world for each machine sent back, it wouldn't be in any machine-code that a robot could parse and thus get dates and coordinates from.

I'm still not sure if the machines that Sarah claims to have destroyed were Skynet models from the T2 future or Legion models from the DF future, or even random shit from inbetween timelines. They were too vague about that, just like they didn't bother going into more detail about Arnold's assimilation with that family. They could have dived much deeper into that, but they chose not to for some reason.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#7, Reply to #4

Apr '20
I'm sure the Terminators Sarah was referring to was a bunch of Skynet T-800s. Although, I'm surprised the movie didn't expect us to believe she also took out a few T-1000s all by herself too. The idea of Carl also being aware of any Legion machines being sent might be the hardest load of bullshit to swallow in the entire movie. But I guess the way it's all set up, there's no way around some of this outside of insulting the viewer's intelligence.


🚸
avatar
Snowy_Owl says:
#2

Apr '20
This is a great review. I actually really liked the movie. @box introduced me to terminator two years ago. Im sure he wanted to strangle me for not having seen the movie, and the fact that I laughed at certain parts of the movie.

That being said, I really loved the movie, and I loved T2 even more. So I was super excited for the new movie. And I loved it. It was funny, and I thought it was done well. I wish it was more violent, but the fact that they switched everything up.

When this movie came out, and I read the reviews though, I was really frustrated. They were talking about how this movie was just hating on men, and it was all about girl power. Which it is about girl power. But I mean, essentially the whole series is. Sarah Connor is a fucking badass. Or at least she turned into one. She can take care of herself, so I really like that the girl they are protecting in this one, is able to hold her own. I also like how they switched up who needs protecting, That it wasn't a baby. That it was her. So it really frustrated me that peole were refusing to watch the movie, based on a couple reviews saying that it was against men, and all about women power, because it really wasn't.

Honestly, this movie played out in a very predictable way. They follwed the terminator formula. It would be very interesting to see where things go from here.

I loved the movie. But I am not very critical, and pretty much like most movies. I want to give things a chance before I make my opinion.


Great Review!!!


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#5, Reply to #2

Apr '20 *
Thank you, Snowy. This one turned out to be quite an ordeal to get all straight, but I knew I was gonna do one for this as soon as I saw it.

I did forget to mention how much more violent this could have been considering the R-rating. I think it's R in name only. The studio execs at least figured out how offputting a PG-13 rating can be after so many R's in the series, but they're still afraid of scaring off kids and losing out on more money, I guess.

I don't think this movie hates on men or is against them, but I think there is an obvious political message that doesn't include them, and is forcing a story and familiar characters to take a back seat, and in some cases, to fuck off and die before their time, giving a lot of long time fans, who have stuck with this series, a slap in the face. If this was an actual remake, that'd be one thing, that's obviously what they'd rather be doing, but the character who has been the hero of the story has been cast aside due to a need to replace the story with a completely random feminist message. The Terminator series is a tip of the iceberg as far as shit like that goes. They threw this new person at us whom we aren't at all familiar with because of her gender. I didn't think we got enough time to get to know her or care all that much before her random transformation near the end. I think there was better storytelling in the original with Linda Hamilton. By the end, she had changed into a badass, and it was more believable due to a better build, imo. Then again, it was just her and Kyle Reese, so, the movie had more time to focus on her as a character as opposed to her gender, or her race, if we're being completely honest.


🚸
avatar
OnyxHades says:
#6

Apr '20
Another great review, babe! I had so much fun going to see this movie with you.

I don't know to much about The Terminator franchise. I'm learning a lot more about it from you, so I can't really get into the whole time travel thing. I 100% agree that this was a very feminist movie. I do feel it made all the men characters (except for the evil terminator) a joke. I hate when movies do that. I'll have a more detailed reply soon. I need to look up some stuff for it.



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.