๐Ÿ””Alerts
Login to get notifications!
๐Ÿ—จ๏ธForum

๐ŸŽž๏ธMovies & TV


๐ŸŒJunk

๐Ÿ”
Search keywords
Joinโž• Now!   or       ๐Ÿ”ฝ Forgot Password?

Jan '19
image

To some of us, Slasher franchises matter. Maybe it's a generational thing but it's true. The big picture, the integrity of it all, maybe even closure. For some reason, closure is a big one for me. That's one reason why I was never down with Rob Zombie's contributions. Because they weren't. Those movies were remakes, and going by past remakes, this is the obvious kiss of death for a franchise, regardless of how much life it had left in it. A trend that has laid waste to more than a couple of Horror series/franchises over the years. However, nobody ever said they had to stay on the shelf forever. Especially if certain remakes didn't live up to expectations. After Rob Zombie had his fun, I don't think anyone had any idea what was next for Michael Myers. I would have voted for nothing, but Hollywood greed happens to be a thing.So, as we know, nothing can only go on for so long before some asshole in a suit makes a suggestion to continue/remake/reboot a well-known franchise regardless of whether or not the last one was indeed the LAST one. Which reminds me, you're up, Michael!

image And I was SO on board with this when I heard they were going to resurrect the original series. And then, of course, reality sets in as it tends to do. The completely predictable announcement that all sequels will be ignored in the upcoming Halloween movie. A new part 2, if you will. Yeah, I don't really give a shit about the Halloween sequels, but this annoys me, just the same. A second chance at closure, but at a price. For one reason or another, the integrity of yet another Horror franchise has been compromised. And now that that's out of the way, time to cheer up because Halloween 2.2 actually turned out to be something special. And yeah, I'm just kidding. They didn't really call it Halloween 2.2. That wouldn't make much sense, would it?. No, they actually called it Halloween, mainly because... OK, then! On with the story!

image Remember H2O? Yeah, neither do I, but whatever was going on with Laurie Strode in that movie never happened. Whoever Laurie Strode was in 1998 no longer exists. I thought excluding Halloween II was a bit harsh, but OK! Nothing has happened since 1978. Got it! That one night messed Laurie up pretty good, though. Nothing too bad but enough to make her into a bit of a Sarah Connor with a drinking problem. Laurie Strode isn't doing very well in 2018. Laurie's questionable child-raising tactics have cost her a decent relationship with her daughter, ultimately costing her a relationship with her granddaughter. It's worth it to Laurie as long as she made a difference, making her daughter even a little more prepared than she would have been. Because you never know. You just never know.

image Yeah, Michael is alive. I guess he was finally caught later that night, and he's been back in the asylum ever since. No return, no revenge, Michael twiddles his thumbs for forty years. Laurie doesn't give a fuck. She's going to blow his brains out if he ever comes around again. Laurie's daughter thinks she's being silly, but Michael is soon being transferred to another hospital, which isn't particularly great for Laurie's anxiety. Despite not existing in all these other sequels that don't exist, Laurie isn't all that surprised when Michael escapes after a wreck. She's not super thrilled about this, but for the first time in years, she doesn't seem like quite the basket case. In control and prepared.

image Earlier, there were some True Crime pod-casters trying to get some words out of Michael, but came up short. Since they had possession of the infamous mask, you know they're going to cross paths again. And just like that, we're able to forget that Michael Myers is a senior citizen, now. After being introduced for a handful of characters that aren't too annoying, we witness Laurie getting her shit together while getting her family with her so she can protect them. Laurie knows Michael is headed for her, but she's going to make him wish he went elsewhere because part of her preparation for this night included turning her house into one big slasher-trap, designed to make things very difficult for a masked maniac who is killing for no apparent reason.

And what a totally uncomplicated premise done effectively as possible. Seriously, well done! Nice, brutal kills and nice touch bringing back the original Michael. Hey, maybe wiping away the past sins of this series is what it took to finally make a good sequel. Laurie doesn't need to be Michael's sister and Paul Rudd's character in part 6 didn't really need to exist. And you know what? It's not always hard to pretend this wasn't Halloween 9, so, I'd say everyone wins, time time... as long as it was the last one and we finally get our Halloween closure. This was the last one, right? 7/10

image


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
markus-san says:
#1

Jan '19 *
https://screenrant.com/halloween-2018-movie-title-reason

Now you know! It's still a crap reason though.. Good review, will be checking the movie out soon enough.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#9, Reply to #1

Jan '19
We donโ€™t want someone who is unfamiliar with the previous films to think, well, I need to catch up.โ€™ So then we just thought, for simplicity, letโ€™s just call it Halloween.


Of course, cuz people are fucking retards, apparently. We mustn't confuse and pressure them with a bunch of numbers.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#2

Jan '19
People describe this series as a choose-your-own-adventure slasher franchise. Many entries ignore previous sequels, but this one tops them all. It ignores about 40 years worth of sequels in hopes of doing it right, and I think they pretty much nailed it.

Jamie Lee is good, the guy who plays Michael for most of the movie (not Nick Castle) is excellent, and the vibes and atmosphere are spot-on. I really love the long shot following Michael as he's killing a bunch of random people for no reason. He just needed to get it out of his system, and it rocked.

I kinda hope they don't make any more, but the same team has expressed interest in more, so I'd watch them if they made them. The problem is with keeping the story simple, and not making yet another comeback of his seem too contrived. This movie had a lot of parallels to the original, especially in the sense of it retreading the same grounds and buildup as the first one. A sequel may very well ruin that, but hardcore fans don't care that Michael is in his 60s. Sixty isn't as old today as it was back then.

I loved it. I hope other franchises take note and try to revitalize their once great series with a worthy sequel like this. Up next... Terminator 6! Aka, the real Terminator 3!


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#3

Jan '19
Halloween (1978) > Rob Zombie's Halloween > Halloween (2018)

I thought it good, but unspectacular in the end. No, not in the butt, you sicko.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#4, Reply to #3

Jan '19
Worse than RZ's Halloween? That was one of the biggest cinematic misfires I'd ever seen, and I was so stoked for that movie in regards to cast and promo materials. Not sure how anyone (other than Hosley) could hold that in a higher regard than ANY entry in the original series. I think I'd even take Resurrection over RZ's movie. To each his own, I guess.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
ZombieCPA says:
#7, Reply to #3

Jan '19
Smelling a pile of dog shit is more entertaining than RZ Halloween.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#8, Reply to #7

Jan '19
Hey, if going around smelling piles of dog shit is your thing, more power to ya!


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#10, Reply to #3

Jan '19
Not in the butt?


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#11, Reply to #10

Jan '19
Not in the butt.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#12, Reply to #11

Jan '19
Gay.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#14, Reply to #12

Jan '19
That's OK, we still like you.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#15, Reply to #14

Jan '19
Really?


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#16, Reply to #15

Jan '19
No, I take it back actually emoticon


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#17, Reply to #16

Feb '19 *
See? Gay! Gay to the max. No offense, though.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#18, Reply to #17

Feb '19
None taken.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
OnyxHades says:
#5

Jan '19
I was surprised by how much I liked this movie. Jamie Lee Curtis was awesome! I loved that she was a badass, but at the same time, you could tell how vulnerable and messed up she was. I actually cried a bit for her during one scene.

This movie is one that I could see myself rewatching quite often. Your review was great, babe!


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#13, Reply to #5

Jan '19
I was surprised too. Perfect finale. They're just gonna make a joke out of the series all over again if they make another one.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
ZombieCPA says:
#6

Jan '19
I havenโ€™t seen it. I will probably stream it this October.



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.