🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Oct '14 *
image In wanting to do something special on Trash Epics for October, I've decided to write a four-part series of reviews, which will cover the first four movies of George Romero's Dead series: Night of the Living Dead (1968), Dawn of the Dead (1978), Day of the Dead (1985), and Land of the Dead (2005). I'm skipping Diary of the Dead (2007) and Survival of the Dead (2009), both because they kind of reboot the series and because no one cares much about them anyway. And I'm not going to beat around the bush here: I love this series. It's easily my favorite horror series and these reviews will most certainly reflect that.

Night of the Living Dead is, appropriately, the first movie that I saw in the Dead series. I only have a few vague memories of that first time, but I do very clearly remember being frightened by it and I'd say for good reason. A cemetery, a farmhouse, no vehicle to get away in, no way to contact anyone for help, and the recently deceased wandering around, pursuing and attacking anyone who's still alive. All perfect, classic, horror movie elements, elements that have been inspiring, ripped off, and spoofed many times since, because Night of the Living Dead is, for good reason, considered the beginning of what people now think of as your typical zombie.

Grab a gun, board up your doors and windows, and join me for another... Reviews with Ballz!

image Night of the Living Dead starts off with brother and sister, Johnny (Russell Streiner) and Barbra (Judith O'Dea), headed down an isolated road to a cemetery to visit their father's grave. Ominous music plays in the background, taken from a stock music library like all other music in the movie, and it's a simple but very effective scene, perfectly setting up the terror that's about to unfold. As Johnny parks the car in the cemetery, the announcer on the radio comes on, talking about how they're back after some technical difficulties. Nothing to be alarmed about, Johnny shrugs it off and joins Barbra in finding their father's grave.


image They aren't in the cemetery for long at all before Johnny decides to start fucking around by teasing Barbra and trying to scare her. This is when he says one of the famous lines of horror cinema history: "They're coming to get you, Barbra!" The perfect line to start George Romero's multi-movie zombie nightmare. Eventually, we move on to a nearby farmhouse, where we meet Ben (Duane Jones), Harry Cooper (Karl Hardman), and several others. While the other actors all do a fine job with their roles, it's Jones and Hardman who really steal the show. Every scene they're in together is just great.


image Night of the Living Dead isn't my favorite of the Dead series, but as I said before, I love it. Everything in it just works really well. The plot, the settings, the music, the actors, the minimal effects. It's impressive what can be done with just $114,000. Sure, that kind of budget wouldn't get you far now, but I feel like low budget then and low budget now have two very different meanings or they at least have two very different mindsets behind them. The movie isn't very gory, especially when compared to the later movies in the Dead series. You aren't thinking about that when you're watching this however because of how great everything else is, though since Tom Savini was originally supposed to do the effects in this as he did for the next two movies, it does make you wonder what he might have been able to do with the budget they had to work with.

image My only real complaint about this movie is the character of Barbra. It wasn't the actress who was the problem, but the character herself and how she was written. I get that she's in shock over everything, but it gets old fast. It's like when there's an annoying, useless kid in a serious movie. Realistic? Maybe. Fun to watch though? Not at all. At least Tom Savini's 1990 remake of Night of the Living Dead improves upon her character, giving her some actual purpose instead of having her just sit around talking crazy. And what really pisses me off is that Romero damn near pulls this same exact shit again in Dawn of the Dead! But more on that issue in that review.

If you've somehow never seen this movie, then you really need to get on that, because you're really missing out of a piece of classic, genre-defining cinema. Avoid the 30th Anniversary Edition of the movie though. I've never seen it myself, but I've never heard a good thing about it.

My Rating: 4/5


🚸
avatar
Shaza123 says:
#1

Oct '14
The character of Barbara may have simply been a product of the times? Women were only just starting to gain some independance, perhaps she was created while still assuming the meek role. But then again, the character of Ben was way ahead of its time. Unless we are meant to read too much into the ending or not. Everytime I watch this movie, I think about the reasons for certain actors and characters motivations in this. The ending always throws me for a loop, I'm curious to know if there was any racial undertones in the reasoning for the ending, or was it purely incidental. I believe Romero has stated it to be incidental, but I still wonder.

It's not my favourite of the Dead series, but in my opinion, it's the best of them.

Great review!

emoticon


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#2, Reply to #1

Oct '14
Thanks! And yeah, it's a possibility for sure, especially if you think of Harry's reactions to Ben and, as you said, the ending. But as you also said, Romero said that was purely incidental, and in fact, said that Duane Jones was cast simply because he had the best audition.

So with that in mind, I think that brings up a lot of other questions, such as, was the script re-written at parts for Ben to fit that he was black or did it truly all just fall into place on its own? If it's the latter, could it be the same for every other part of the movie like that, such as what we've discussed about Barbra? I think this same logic can be applied to the sequels as well and the so-called social commentary that people say those possess as well.

I'm not saying his movies are completely void of social commentary either and that people are just trying to make something out of nothing, because some of it is quite obviously intentional on Romero's part, especially in Dawn of the Dead (for example: abortion and a black cop killing a racist white cop, both of which are pretty controversial topics). And well, I think that's part of the fun to his movies too. Those little things give people something to talk about besides just the movie. Though it would take away from that fun, I'd love to see someone sit down with Romero sometime with a list of all these things and just ask him for each one: was this intentional on your part?



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.