Feb '17 *
I've always dug the sequel more than the original.
The first seems one-dimensional by comparison
(strictly beheadings, as opposed to an elevator killing, for example).
It didn't hurt that in the sequel, he's protected by ravens, rather than a rottweiler.
Imho, the cemetary conversations in the sequel are more compelling than any in part one.
I also prefer the conclusion in the sequel (since he's that much closer to world-domination).
The first seems one-dimensional by comparison
(strictly beheadings, as opposed to an elevator killing, for example).
It didn't hurt that in the sequel, he's protected by ravens, rather than a rottweiler.
Imho, the cemetary conversations in the sequel are more compelling than any in part one.
I also prefer the conclusion in the sequel (since he's that much closer to world-domination).
I like III as well. Good score and you can't go wrong with Sam Neill.