๐Ÿ””Alerts
Login to get notifications!
๐Ÿ—จ๏ธForum

๐ŸŽž๏ธMovies & TV


๐ŸŒJunk

๐Ÿ”
Search keywords
Joinโž• Now!   or       ๐Ÿ”ฝ Forgot Password?
avatar
๐Ÿšธ

Martin (1978)


Mar 2019
How did he do it? How did George Romero make not one, but two masterpieces in one year?! Some may not like Martin as much as I do, but this movie resonated with me so much when I first saw it. I remember the days of discovering old school horror movies by the legends of the genre, such as Carpenter, Craven, Argento, Romero... Such a fun time to be alive!

This unconventional family drama is disguised as a vampire movie, but it's all about the writing. His first cut was about three hours long, so wtf was that going to be about? Probably the black and white "flashback" segments, fleshed out to the max?

Either way, I think it's important that a director can embelish his story to the point where he has to omit parts in order to convey a tighter paced story. Then again, there are certain movies like Dawn of the Dead that should never end. Romero could have probably made that into a tv show, because he was very hands on with his movies, doing multiple things like writing, directing, editing, etc. He put a lot of detail into those early movies of his, and it shows. I always found Martin to be one of Romero's most intricate movies.

John Amplas is an interesting guy, but I haven't seen much out of him. He has bit parts in other Romero movies, like the skeleton in Creepshow's "Father's Day" segment, a gang member in the swat opening of Dawn of the Dead, a mime in Knightriders, doctor Fisher in Day of the Dead, and then a villain John Russo's "Midnight". Plus, his imdb pic is the coolest fucking thing ever: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0025355/ I still need to see Toxic Zombies, also.

The gloomy/angelic score is good, I love the grim ultra-70s look of it, and I love the cast. They're all great, including the crazy old man Cuda, who kind of looks like the KFC guy, only angry.

One of the great things about these reputable horror directors' earlier films is that they would all have their regulars, and they would always work well together. I think it's important for directors to get these dynamics ironed out so they can pump out cool movies one after the other.

Like the other aforementioned classic directors out there, Romero had his regulars, and they're awesome. Tom Savini has a decent role, and he also doesn't have a mustache. Weird seeing him without his regular facial hair. His character Arthur is banging Romero's then wife Christine Forrest's character "Christine". Plus, that old guy who always shoots the wrong guy in zombie movies like Night of the Living Dead and Flesheater is there at the beginning on the train. Apparently, Lincoln Maazel who plays Cuda is in Romero's lost movie "The Amusement Park", which I hope gets a release date soon. That movie sounds awesome.

Martin, though? Martin is the vampire masterpiece of a man whose career is known for zombies, which is to say it's overlooked by a lot of people, and I think that's a shame. Then again, Martin is only a small story about a family suffering from inherited madness, but the execution is quite perfect, in my opinion.

There was a period where I was obsessed with this movie. I'd make time to watch it ever few weeks. I miss the days when I could zone out to the latest (vintage) horror titles I could find. Somehow, it doesn't really happen that way anymore. I watch these once favorites less and less often, and I guess it's because I burn out, but then again, there aren't many movies that can affect an up-and-coming horror fan as much as the pioneers who basically invented the genre. Martin has always been one of my favorites.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#1

Mar 2019
Box, you really need to check out Mary, Mary, Bloody Mary (1975). It is not your traditional vampire flick in the sense that this one is about vampirism as a disease like George Romero's 'Martin' - only 'Mary, Mary, Bloody Mary' predates it by three years. It is basically a female version of Martin.

You won't regret it. You need to watch it.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#2, Reply to #1

Mar 2019
Sold. I'll keep an eye out.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#3, Reply to #2

Mar 2019
I would really urge you to watch. It is in the database here. It is a great horror for 'loners like myself who likes Martin.

Tarantino also spoke about his own experience in relation to Mary, Mary, Bloody Mary. He said that the first time he ever heard of the film was at the age of 12 when he saw it as a coming attraction preview before a television program that featured horror films.Speaking about the film, Tarantino said, โ€œItโ€™s not a vampire movie per se, because the lead character, Mary, does not have any supernatural powers, she just has a disease that she has to drink blood.โ€ Tarantino compared Mary, Mary, Bloody Mary to the film Martin (1976), by George Romero, whose protagonist isnโ€™t a vampire either, but has the need to drink blood.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#4

Mar 2019
Nice write-up, Box! You can always tell when someone loves a particular movie when they can gush about it so effortlessly. Well done.

I, too, love Martin. Probably not quite to the extent that you do, but it definitely proves the man can do more than just zombie movies.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#6, Reply to #4

Mar 2019
I'll gush some more. Martin is also a video nasty, and those are always a fun product of their time. John Amplas got to be in two video nasties around that era, both because of that Romero/Russo circle. Those guys knew their shit. However, "Midnight" (1982) isn't very renowned, but I thought it was alright. Lawrence Tierney plays a good drunk in it. He probably played a good drunk in real life, too.

I find Martin to be somewhat symbolic, too. Whereas the characters are suffering from internal madness, the surrounding city is suffering from economic depression. They talk about how it's hard to find good help, and how Arthur is having trouble finding work. Plus, there's that whole shot of the crane picking up the crushed car. I think that adds an elegant layer of trash to the movie, not to mention an actual shot of some trash cans, a lot of alleyway shots, a few hoboes, some adult video stores, ghetto thugs, etc... This movie really is a trash epic.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
sfpx says:
#8, Reply to #6

Mar 2019
I'm a pretty big fan of Midnight, actually. That's a fun one. And Lawrence Tierney definitely plays a great pervert drunk. Didn't seem to take a while lot of...ahem...mental preparation for the role.

In regards to your second paragraph - good insight! I never really noticed that before, but it makes sense. The next time I watch it I'll have to do so with all that in mind.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#9, Reply to #8

Mar 2019
As simple as this movie may seem compared to Romero's other epics, this film has a lot of layers to the tragedy of it all.

For instance, I love the bit where they're both in the field of flowers having a picnic. This is their idea of being happy, but you can tell that neither of them are really happy about any of, considering what happens just about right after that scene.

It's hard to be content in the company of others. Sometimes, it's easier to be alone. Martin tries to be normal, but there is no normal, and "there's no real magic. There's no real magic ever."


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#10, Reply to #9

Mar 2019
That line is haunting, and the line where he says everybody goes away.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
DerTables says:
#5

Mar 2019
Posted Mary Bloody Mary to the Trash Movies on Youtube thread.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
Ballz says:
#7

Mar 2019
You already know how I feel about Martin, so I won't bother dragging down this thread. One thing you said resonated with me though:

I remember the days of discovering old school horror movies by the legends of the genre, such as Carpenter, Craven, Argento, Romero... Such a fun time to be alive!


I frequently miss those days. There are undoubtedly great horror movies we still haven't seen, but none of them are going to lead us down a rabbit hole of the director's filmography.

These days I try to avoid watching my favorites too often. James Rolfe once said he'd last watched the Friday the 13th films a decade prior when they came out on DVD and he was finally watching them again because they were on Blu-ray. All I could think was how much he must've forgotten about the movies and how fresh they must've felt.

I doubt I could go a decade without watching Dawn of the Dead or even a Friday the 13th, but considering I just watched Dawn again twice recently, I want to try going as long as I can without watching it. For no reason other than to preserve my fascination for it and if I'm lucky, regain a small sense of discovery from those days long ago.

Also, I should rewatch Martin soon. It's been at least half a decade since I last saw it.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
#11

Mar 2019 *
Martin has always been among my favorite Romero movies, only Night and Dawn coming in over it. Never got how it wasn't as popular as his other flicks like The Crazies and Monkey Shines...it's far better.

For another unique take on the vampire flick check out Spike Lee's Da Sweet Blood of Jesus.


๐Ÿšธ
avatar
#12

Mar 2019 *
Know what I love about this movie??
The classic vampire is smooth and charming. Essentially he/she seduces his/her victims into becoming victims. Then there's the more animalistic vampire who just overpower and tear into their victims, ala 30 Days of Night.
Martin is different. He's not charming or strong. He's a loner and a loser. Sexually frustrated. His methods of acquiring victims are underhanded and desperate. Essentially, his vampirism takes the form of rape, both obviously and more subtly. And as an added bonus to that, he's somewhat a sympathetic and relateable character.

There's so many obvious and gratuitous ways to be disturbing. This movie doesn't go that route. Its methods to disturb are insidiously smart and worm their way into your brain. The more you engage with it and think about it, the more twisted it becomes. Plus it just has this supremely strange atmosphere unlike any other movie.

It's Romero's deepest and darkest. Certainly his most underrated.



Loading...

Online

@

Loading...

@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.