🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Jul 2017
The king of zombies has fallen to the hands of lung cancer. He was in the middle of developing some more zombie stuff too. As the years went on, his movies were noticably less awesome than they were pre-90s, but he was a great director, an even greater writer, and when he made a movie, he went all out. Just imagine how insane it was back to employ so many extras, to play walking corpses! He also starred in his movies, edited them, and had his own style of filmmaking. Directors these days? You can substitute anybody for the director, and the movie would probably feel the same. Filmmakers today don't have the passion that this guy did, and you can tell that from the behind the scenes stuff.

TOP 5:
Martin (1977) - I'd read that Romero considers this his best film. It's certainly the one that stuck with me the most.
Dawn of the Dead (1978) - This movie was cool as fuck. The characters, the plot, the progression, the music, everything.
Night of the Living Dead (1968) - The one that started it all. It's a perfect (public domain) movie to put on for any horror occasion.
Creepshow (1982) - The perfect horror anthology, with a star studded cast.
Day of the Dead (1985) - More moody zombie shit with wonderful gore.

Too bad I didn't meet him at the conventions. I probably should've bit the bullet and paid the big bucks and waited the long lines, but oh well. My late teen years were dedicated to finding more George Romero movies to watch.

I never understood why he included his middle initial A in his name. When someone says "George Romero", we all know they're talking about this guy, because he's the only one that counts.

RIP - George A. Romero

Without googling it, do you know what the A. stands for? Answer: Andrew



🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#1

Jul 2017
I always liked George Romero. I haven't seen all of his filmography, and there are some movies that I like better than some of his others, but the were always fun and the underlying social commentary was outstanding.

Here is what I seen ranked, in order:

Martin (1978)
Day of the Dead (1985)
The Dark Half (1993)
Night of the Living Dead (1968)
Dawn of the Dead (1978)
Diary of the Dead (2007)
Survival of the Dead (2009)
Land of the Dead (2005)
The Crazies (1973)
Creepshow (1982)
Bruiser (2000)
Hungry Wives (1972)
Monkey Shines (1988)


🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#2

Jul 2017 *
Yes, you are right, he did consider Martin his best. Out of curiosity, why did Martin stuck with you?


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#3, Reply to #2

Jul 2017
I'm a reclusive character, and I found something very sympathetic about him, and his awkward performance. It's like a family drama, crime, exploitation, horror, doomed-romance, bleak and bitter, and overall... a haunting little story.


🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#5, Reply to #3

Jul 2017
Actually, those are the very same reasons it stuck with me. That film haunts me.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#4

Jul 2017
My top five's mostly the same as yours. I'd only swap out Martin for Knightriders.

He was the first horror director I considered myself to be a fan of. I was renting Dawn of the Dead almost weekly a while before I'd seen most other horror movies from that same era.


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#6, Reply to #4

Jul 2017
Dawn was such an expansive movie, not only in terms of cast and crew, but also because there's so many versions, and so much history about this movie. It should be an essential film for any horror fan to obsess about. I can watch it at any time. I might watch it right after I finish watching his monkey movie. One of these days, we need to get a Planet of the Zombie Apes film. That'd be something.


🚸
avatar
Tommix says:
#8, Reply to #6

Jul 2017
Maybe "Dawn of the Apes"...? Or, one of those parody titles like Dawn of the Planet of the Night of the Living Dead Apes, I guess.


🚸
avatar
Tommix says:
#7

Jul 2017
I can't believe we have to do this thread. How can he be gone.

I pretty much agree with what you said. For me personally, I thought Land of the Dead was possibly his best one from this century... overall, he clearly went into a decline as time went by, but I mostly enjoyed that movie, and I appreciate what he tried to do with it.

Dawn of the Dead 1978 is tremendous. It might be the movie I have rewatched the most, in my life... have to think about that, but I bet it's close.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#9, Reply to #7

Jul 2017
I agree about Land of the Dead. It's not as good as the first three, but it's a lot of fun. Great assortment of characters. Romero's characters almost always stood out anyway, but they were never as varied in personality as they are in Land.


🚸
avatar
#10, Reply to #7

Jul 2017
In Land the social commentary was maybe a little too obvious and preachy, but it was still a decent horror movie. Dawn was funnier and a little more sly about it.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#11

Jul 2017
Yeah. That's a big one. He seemed like a nice, laid back guy. Night/Dawn/Day were some special movies, in completely different ways. Well, last year, I began the Oct. Challenge with Blood Feast. Guess it'll be Night Of The Living Dead, this year.


🚸
avatar
Johan_WoW says:
#12

Jul 2017
Thx for this thread Box.

I still haven't seen Martin but with a week of vacation coming up, I am going to give it a try. I do love the Living Dead movies and they will get a revisit too.


🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#13, Reply to #12

Jul 2017
I hope you like it, Johan, but I am not sure if you will. It is a vampire movie which is predominantly male driven.


🚸
avatar
Johan_WoW says:
#15, Reply to #13

Jul 2017 *
Well that might be the reason I have not been wanting to check it out yet. But you know me I like to take a risk. I mean this guy made a trilogy that I consider as the best trilogy I know of even though it's no real back to back sequels.

I saw Christine today, also rather male driven. That wasn't the biggest problem I had with it, but the rather bland execution of an interesting concept and pretty horrible character development. I mean I wanted Christine to win in the end since I didn't care for any of the human characters (the girl was also dull). It's Carpenter, his movies just cannot grip me always for the same reasons. Style and soundtrack over substance.
Romero on the other hand has been able to give me that sense of dread, character development, characters to either love or hate and lil Karen Cooper's transformation , that face and all the great photography and artwork it resulted in emoticon


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#21, Reply to #15

Jul 2017
Christine is okay. It's got a few great things going for it, but it's kinda dumb at the same time.

You might actually like Martin though. If you're big on females (who isn't?), this one has some good characters. Romero's wife Christine Forrest plays one of the main ones, and she looked pretty good back in the day. Only 10 years later in Monkey Shines did she start to look like "Nurse Ratchet".

Like I say in the OP, Romero was a great writer, and he could write some great characters. I thought Fran in Dawn of the Dead was a nuisance, but she got decent at the end. Even the crappy characters have an arc in Romero stories!


🚸
avatar
peeptoad says:
#14

Jul 2017
RIP to one of the great masters of horror... emoticon

my top 5 Romero directed flicks:

1. Night of the Living Dead (1968)
2. Martin (1978)
3. Day of the Dead (1985)
4. Dawn of the Dead (1978)
5. The Crazies (1973)

...and I highly recommend the doc Birth of the Living Dead (2013) to anyone who hasn't seen it yet.


🚸
avatar
#16

Jul 2017
I am sad over this loss. I met him once, sweet man.

My top 5 Romero films.

Martin
Dawn
Day
Night
Creep


🚸
avatar
Smerd says:
#17

Jul 2017
Dawn
Martin
Night
Knightriders
Day

He was a Master of Horror, yet he never filmed an episode for Masters Of Horror, yet they had guys who weren't even remotely masters making episodes, but I digress.


🚸
avatar
foz says:
#22, Reply to #17

Jul 2017
read somewhere that Garris asked him to do a MoH but for scheduelling or whatever reason he couldn't. His segment of Two Evil Eyes is better than most of them anyway. Agree they had some dubious writer/directors who were barely up n coming let alone Masters...


anyway time to toast the memory of a true horror auteur, hwyl fawr George you'll be missed but your contribution to film will live on forever


🚸
avatar
Smerd says:
#23, Reply to #22

Jul 2017
That's nice to hear he was asked, and it was just scheduling that George couldn't do it.

emoticon to George!




Loading...

Online

@

Loading...

@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.