🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Feb 2018 *
image

Anyone ever wonder what became of crazy fat Ethel after that abrupt ending to Criminally Insane? Yeah, me either. As much as I would have loved an extra 15 minutes more of that movie, I'm good, and am definitely capable of using my imagination regarding the immediate and distant future of Ethel Janowski. So, no, Mr. Millard. That's quite alright. No need to risk making the worst part 2 in the history of part 2s just to give us Criminally Insane fans closure. That is, unless you have some really good ideas planned ... Just kidding. He already made it. That's just what I would have said to Nick Millard in 1987, had I heard about this and was someone he knew and listened to. I'm sure you get the joke. However, Criminally Insane 2 is no joke. At least I'm pretty sure it's not. Let's just assume this was an honest attempt at a movie, as we've been given no reason to think otherwise. Yet, one thing made abundantly clear right off the bat is that, somewhere between 1973 and 1987, Nick Millard became a lazy pile of shit.

image Adding filler to movies isn't exactly a crime, but that's not really what we're looking at, here, is it? We're looking at more than 60% of the runtime consisting of scenes from the original movie. And right after some familiar opening credits, the tone is set as we get a quick glimpse of Ethel in the mental hospital, only to be shown an immediate flashback which lasts thrice as long. Ethel sits there, day dreaming about the good old days during that short time period between grandmother's death and her inevitable capture. And even more tone setting as Ethel indulges in some old looking pudding after a light lunch. Ethel feels as if it wasn't enough and makes this known at the top of her lungs. At this point, we've practically already seen the entire movie.

The mental hospital where Ethel has been staying hasn't been getting the funding it needs and is being forced to release the less necessary patients. For some reason, they think Ethel fits into this category. She doesn't. One could make the case that she doesn't seem quite as delusional or dangerous as she once did but we can tell Ethel isn't sorry. We can tell she's still that crazy fat fuck who would kill a relative for a plate of baked potatoes. Ethel may have shed a few pounds, but she's still Ethel.

image As luck would have it, the nice people from the asylum hooked Ethel up with a spot in a halfway house, ran by Mrs. Bartholomew, whose motto is "We must never lose hope". And considering her first name is Hope, I'd say she really means this. Hope Bartholomew looks pretty old, but insists she's not Ethel's dead grandmother when accused. There's also some guy with a mustache, hanging around. Ethel thinks he's George "Buck" Flower, of all people. He's not.

After thinking about the events of the first movie for a while, Ethel takes a nap and dreams about the events of the first movie. Meanwhile, some idiot eats broth containing dead flies. Later on, the same idiot eats some dog food which Ethel thinks is funny. A few minutes later, she kills a guy for eating a candy bar in front of her, even though he had offered her one. After the much-needed laugh and murder, Ethel is all tuckered out and ready for another nap. During this nap, Ethel dreams about the events of the first movie. Later on, Ethel gets blackmailed out of her pudding by the mustache guy. Although I don't know why she even cares because it looks like that same old pudding from the asylum. But believe me. She cares! After a failed poisoning of her blackmailer, Ethel does the dishes, has an apple and stabs him to death. After thinking about stuff she did in the first movie, Ethel kills everyone else, leading to one last nap. You'll never believe what she dreams about, this time...

image What kind of careless dickhead does this? I get that not all directors take themselves or their movies super seriously, but this is so much more than an inferior sequel. And like I said, I don't even think this is a joke. Criminally Insane 2 is a scam. I'm not sure if Millard stood to make anything off this, but one afternoon in 1987, something resembling a sequel to Criminally Insane came to be. Like it or not. Whatever. I personally never asked for a sequel, so, this guy can shove it up his ass as far as I'm concerned. Seriously, though. It wouldn't have killed him to have a couple of those flashbacks take place during Ethel's stay at the nut house. Or if he was so in love with the original, why not remake it? Or do the sequel and have it be a short film. Literally anything but this would have been an improvement.

I couldn't help laughing when I watched Ethel, sitting there, eating pretzels. Even something so minor stays true to the tone of the movie. Think about it like this: We've gone from Exrta large Ethel to medium Ethel. We've gone from film to video. And yes. We have gone from watching Ethel choke down Nilla Wafers to sorry ass pretzels! You won't find one aspect that's not completely inferior to that of the original. One more thing I should point out. I've seen three post-Criminally Insane 2 films by Nick Millard. Death Nurse 1 and 2, and Cemetery Sisters. All three of these 60 minute SOVs include scenes from Criminally Insane, yet, none of them has a single thing to do with it. So, there's that. Take from it what you will. Well, maybe THAT was a joke? Maybe he got into drugs? Who knows? All I can say is Nick Millard is a real piece of work. 1/10

image


🚸
avatar
sfpx says:
#1

Feb 2018
Such a shame the movie is mostly scenes from the first. Maybe I'd watch it if not for that fact.

That VHS art is great. Probably cost more to do than the movie itself.

Say, where's that thread you were gonna make about 80s SOV? Thought that's what this was gonna be.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#2, Reply to #1

Feb 2018
Well, if you watch this, along with Death Nurse 1 and 2, that's enough original footage for a full movie. Although you'll have to watch the same scenes from Cirminally Insane over and over. emoticon

I've already done so many reviews for 80's sov, not sure which 3 to do. Too bad Blood Lake and Redneck Zombies are taken. Guess I'd have to go with Black Devil Dolll From Hell, Video Violence and either Splatter Farm or Sledgehammer. Maybe I'll do all 4.


🚸
avatar
foz says:
#3, Reply to #2

Feb 2018
Splatter Farm could be fun, curious to read your take on early Polonias


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#5, Reply to #3

Feb 2018
Early Polonia is the only Polonia review you're gonna get outta me. I've seen Holla If I Kill You and Peter Rottentail. emoticon


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#4

Feb 2018
Why do films like this and Hills Haves Eyes 2 and Silent Night Deadly Night 2 rely on flashbacks? I guess it was a humorous technique at the time, but it quickly proved itself to be utterly retarded.

I remember this movie being a lot more boring than the first. The original was more concise, and for a movie about a lard-ass, there wasn't much fat and filler to the story. I love the original for the film aesthetic, the runtime, and the inclusion of George Buck Flower, which is an auto-win. He's a goddamn legend, but this sequel is entirely underwhelming.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#6, Reply to #4

Feb 2018
There's only one reason to add flashbacks from the previous movie. A lack of ideas, and I guess a lack of creativity when coming up with filler. HGL did some silly shit in the name of filler but he never just recycled a large chunk of an older film. That's goddamned retarded. This has to be the most shameless one to do ths because it's every 3 or 4 minutes from beginning to end. SNDN 2 isn't t all that bad cuz at least there's a point when it stops and there's a good 40 minutes of consistent new movie.


🚸
avatar
OnyxHades says:
#7

Feb 2018 *
I really like the first movie, but I don't get the point of this sequel at all. They could have done so much with it, instead, they took the lazy approach. This could possibly be the most pointless sequels ever. Where's the damn Nilla Wafers?!?emoticon Your review is great babe, unfortunately, this movie is not. It's like that pudding, spoiled.

Can't wait for your next review!


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#8, Reply to #7

Feb 2018
There wasn't enough in the budget for Nilla Wafers, but they happened to find a bag of pretzels for 85 cents at the dollar store. Or so I hear.


🚸
avatar
OnyxHades says:
#9, Reply to #8

Feb 2018
Who the hell wants pretzels?emoticon


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#10, Reply to #9

Feb 2018
Fags and cunts.


@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.