🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?

Jan 2018 *
The first movie I saw in 2017 was Lav Diaz's Melancholia. Seven and a half goddamn hours long. I watched it in three sittings.

Edit - 2018, not 2017. emoticon Already halfway through January!


🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#1

Jan 2018
I seen Shoah (1985) - an epic documentary (if it counts) about the story of the Holocaust that ran for 9h 26min! I have it on DVD (4 Disc Set & 184 Page Book Special Edition Box Set). It is a great addition to my collection.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#8, Reply to #1

Jan 2018
I've heard a lot about this one, but honestly don't have much desire to ever watch it. It is ranked extremely high on the TSPDT list though, so if I ever go about trying to complete the Top 250 on there or something I'll have to see it eventually.


🚸
avatar
Gymnopedie says:
#9, Reply to #8

Jan 2018
It is a breathtaking harrowing experience. Even though I own it I couln't see myself watching it anytime soon. It is one of these films that you must see once in a lifetime. Kinda like Earthlings (2005)


🚸
avatar
Znep27 says:
#2

Jan 2018
I don't go for those long ass movies. I'm pretty sure the longest one I've seen is The Godfather Part II at 3 hours 22 minutes.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#7, Reply to #2

Jan 2018
Fantastic film. I slightly prefer it to the first one.


🚸
avatar
Box_a_Hair says:
#10, Reply to #2

Jan 2018
That's probably mine, too. Another De Niro movie I've always been meaning to see is Sergio Leone's "Once Upon a Time in America", which is 3 hours and 49 minutes.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#3

Jan 2018
It was most likely the documentary Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy. 4 hours exactly according to IMDb. A great and obviously thorough look at the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise.

If documentaries don't count, then probably Seven Samurai, at 3 hours, 27 minutes.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#6, Reply to #3

Jan 2018
Seven Samurai is an amazing movie.


🚸
avatar
Johan_WoW says:
#4

Jan 2018
Even though it feels much more like a miniseries it's registered as movie

Les vampires (1915): 7 hours long

Something more recent:

The 10th Kingdom (2000): also 7 hours even though this is also labeled as miniseries


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#5, Reply to #4

Jan 2018
Les vampires is on my watchlist, looks pretty good!

Never heard of the 10th Kingdom.


🚸
avatar
Tromafreak says:
#11

Jan 2018
Probably that third Lord Of The Rings movie which was nearly 3 and a half hours. I was pretty drunk so it wasn't that bad of an experience, I guess. I feel like there might be something longer than that but can't think of it if there is. Anything past 90 minutes is long to me.


🚸
avatar
ZombieCPA says:
#12

Jan 2018
Jekyll (2007) at 334 minutes followed by The Dark Secret of Harvest Home (1978) at 300 minutes.


🚸
avatar
#13

Jan 2018
the website i use now doesn't seem to have a sort option for runtime but i think it's Blue is the Warmest Color at 179 minutes.

unless you count Kill Bill as one film (247 min) like i do. not really sure if that's unusual to do.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#18, Reply to #13

Jan 2018
I always feel like I'm in the minority for thinking the second Kill Bill is significantly better than the first one.


🚸
avatar
foz says:
#14

Jan 2018
Saw Bela Tarr's Satantango at a film festival a few years ago, same bum numbing 450mins as Melancholia and also split into three. It's an impressive feat of cinema, but have to admit i did get bored and fidgety in parts.

The NOES doc has been mentioned, there's a F13 one thats quite long - Crystal Lake Memories, & 'Video Nasties: the Definitive Guide' is almost 7 and a half hours.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#17, Reply to #14

Jan 2018
Niceee. Yeah, I still haven't seen Satantango but I'd like to someday.


🚸
avatar
Yakko says:
#15

Jan 2018
Probably 2001: A Space Odyseey, Titanic and The English Patient. All monumentally terrible movies and a huge waste of time. The money that was wasted making such garbage could have been used to make tons of more enjoyable low budget horror films, or even feed starving people.


🚸
avatar
RedHawk10 says:
#16, Reply to #15

Jan 2018
I would not be opposed to the money that went into making Titanic and The English Patient being used to feed starving people.


@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.